Amedeo Smart

Free Medical Literature Service

 

Amedeo

Prostate Cancer
  Free Subscription

Articles published in
Eur J Radiol
    April 2024
  1. PAUSCH AM, Elsner C, Rupp NJ, Eberli D, et al
    MRI-based monitoring of prostate cancer after HIFU: Inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance of the PI-FAB score.
    Eur J Radiol. 2024;175:111463.
    >> Share

    March 2024
  2. QUENTIN M, Boschheidgen M, Radtke JP, Spohn F, et al
    MRI in-bore biopsy following MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in patients with persistent suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Eur J Radiol. 2024;175:111436.
    >> Share

    January 2024
  3. GIGANTI F, Asbach P
    The backbone of prostate MRI: Technical acquisition and image quality.
    Eur J Radiol. 2024;172:111320.
    >> Share

    December 2023
  4. REN X, Nur Salihin Yusoff M, Hartini Mohd Taib N, Zhang L, et al
    (68)Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI in the detection of primary prostate cancer: A systematic review and head-to-head comparative meta-analysis.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;170:111274.
    >> Share

  5. HARTH C, De Vulder N, Hermie L, Vanlangenhove P, et al
    Stereotactic transgluteal prostatic biopsy using Cone-Beam CT navigation and prebiopsy MRI image fusion in a patient without rectal access.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;170:111265.
    >> Share

  6. KHAN A, Moore CM, Minhaj Siddiqui M
    Prostate MRI and image quality: The urologist's perspective.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;170:111255.
    >> Share

  7. WENDEROTT K, Krups J, Luetkens JA, Gambashidze N, et al
    Prospective effects of an artificial intelligence-based computer-aided detection system for prostate imaging on routine workflow and radiologists' outcomes.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;170:111252.
    >> Share

    November 2023
  8. PAUSCH AM, Ghafoor S, Kluckert J, Rupp NJ, et al
    Risk factors for prostate cancer in men with false-negative mpMRI: A retrospective single center cohort study of image quality scores and clinical parameters.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;170:111227.
    >> Share

  9. AGGARWAL P, Singh H, Das CK, Mavuduru RS, et al
    Potential role of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT in metastatic renal cell cancer: A prospective study.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;170:111218.
    >> Share

  10. REHMAN I, Pang E, Harris AC, Chang SD, et al
    Bi-parametric prostate MRI with a recall system for contrast enhanced imaging: Improving accessibility while maintaining quality.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;169:111186.
    >> Share

  11. FLEMING H, Dias AB, Talbot N, Li X, et al
    Inter-reader variability and reproducibility of the PI-QUAL score in a multicentre setting.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;168:111091.
    >> Share

    October 2023
  12. AL-MONAJJED R, Radtke JP, Thomas M, Boschheidgen M, et al
    Multiparametric MRI characteristics of prostatitis and atrophy in the peripheral zone in men without prostate cancer.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;169:111151.
    >> Share

  13. ZHANG KS, Mayer P, Glemser PA, Tavakoli AA, et al
    Are T2WI PI-RADS sub-scores of transition zone prostate lesions biased by DWI information? A multi-reader, single-center study.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;167:111026.
    >> Share

  14. SABBAH M, Gutierrez P, Puech P
    MA-QC: Free online software for prostate MR quality control and PI-QUAL assessment.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;167:111027.
    >> Share

    September 2023
  15. SINGH S, Giganti F, Dickinson L, Rogers H, et al
    Prostate MR image quality of apparent diffusion coefficient maps versus fractional intracellular volume maps from VERDICT MRI using the PI-QUAL score and a dedicated Likert scale for artefacts.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;168:111109.
    >> Share

  16. YILMAZ EC, Harmon SA, Belue MJ, Merriman KM, et al
    Evaluation of a Deep Learning-based Algorithm for Post-Radiotherapy Prostate Cancer Local Recurrence Detection Using Biparametric MRI.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;168:111095.
    >> Share

  17. ROBERTSON SH, Owenby E, Beasley C, Wall L, et al
    Optimization of non-endorectal prostate MR image quality using PI-QUAL: A multidisciplinary team approach.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;166:110998.
    >> Share

  18. PONSIGLIONE A, Campo I, Sachs C, Sofia C, et al
    Extraprostatic incidental findings on prostate mpMRI: A pictorial review from the ESUR junior network.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;166:110984.
    >> Share

    August 2023
  19. FENNESSY FM, Maier SE
    Quantitative diffusion MRI in prostate cancer: Image quality, what we can measure and how it improves clinical assessment.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;167:111066.
    >> Share

  20. GIROMETTI R, Giannarini G, De Martino M, Caregnato E, et al
    Multivariable stratification of PI-RADS version 2.1 categories for the risk of false-positive target biopsy: Impact on prostate biopsy decisions.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110897.
    >> Share

  21. THIJSSEN LCP, de Rooij M, Barentsz JO, Huisman HJ, et al
    Radiomics based automated quality assessment for T2W prostate MR images.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110928.
    >> Share

  22. DEIVASIGAMANI S, Kotamarti S, Adams ES, Seguier D, et al
    Reconciling discordance between PI-RADS 4 lesions and targeted biopsy: Early experience of a multidisciplinary quality improvement protocol with PI-RADS 4 subcategorization.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110929.
    >> Share

    July 2023
  23. LEE KL, Kessler DA, Dezonie S, Chishaya W, et al
    Assessment of deep learning-based reconstruction on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted prostate MRI image quality.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;166:111017.
    >> Share

  24. BRILLAT-SAVARIN N, Wu C, Aupin L, Thoumin C, et al
    3.0 T prostate MRI: Visual assessment of 2D and 3D T2-weighted imaging sequences using PI-QUAL score.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;166:110974.
    >> Share

  25. PONSIGLIONE A, Stanzione A, Califano G, De Giorgi M, et al
    MR image quality in local staging of prostate cancer: Role of PI-QUAL in the detection of extraprostatic extension.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;166:110973.
    >> Share

  26. SEYREK N, Hollemans E, Schoots IG, van Leenders GJLH, et al
    Association of quantifiable prostate MRI parameters with any and large cribriform pattern in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;166:110966.
    >> Share

    June 2023
  27. BECKER AS, Giganti F, Purysko AS, Fainberg J, et al
    Taking PI-QUAL beyond the prostate: Towards a standardized radiological image quality score (RI-QUAL).
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110955.
    >> Share

  28. URSPRUNG S, Herrmann J, Joos N, Weiland E, et al
    Accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate using deep learning image reconstruction: A retrospective comparison with standard diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110953.
    >> Share

  29. MOLLER JM, Boesen L, Hansen AE, Kettles K, et al
    Quantification of cross-vendor variation in ADC measurements in vendor-specific prostate MRI-protocols.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110942.
    >> Share

  30. PURYSKO AS, Tempany C, Macura KJ, Turkbey B, et al
    American College of Radiology initiatives on prostate magnetic resonance imaging quality.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110937.
    >> Share

  31. FUTTERER JJ, Tempany C
    Prostate MRI and image quality: The radiologist's perspective.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110930.
    >> Share

  32. ALIS D, Kartal MS, Seker ME, Guroz B, et al
    Deep learning for assessing image quality in bi-parametric prostate MRI: A feasibility study.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110924.
    >> Share

  33. BASAR Y, Alis D, Seker ME, Kartal MS, et al
    Inter-reader agreement of the prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) score for basic readers in prostate MRI: A multi-center study.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110923.
    >> Share

  34. COELHO FMA, Amaral LTW, Mitsutake LKN, Mussi TC, et al
    Quality assessment of prostate MRI by PI-QUAL score: Inter-reader agreement and impact on prostate cancer local staging at 3 Tesla.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110921.
    >> Share

  35. ZHANG KS, Neelsen CJO, Wennmann M, Glemser PA, et al
    Same-day repeatability and Between-Sequence reproducibility of Mean ADC in PI-RADS lesions.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110898.
    >> Share

    May 2023
  36. KIM H, Kang SW, Kim JH, Nagar H, et al
    The role of AI in prostate MRI quality and interpretation: Opportunities and challenges.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;165:110887.
    >> Share

  37. DE OLIVEIRA CORREIA ET, Qiao PL, Griswold MA, Chen Y, et al
    Magnetic resonance fingerprinting based comprehensive quantification of T1 and T2 values of the background prostatic peripheral zone: Correlation with clinical and demographic features.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;164:110883.
    >> Share

  38. WANG R, Pinto D, Liu T, Hamade M, et al
    Effect of a dedicated PI-QUAL curriculum on the assessment of prostate MRI quality.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;164:110865.
    >> Share

  39. GIROMETTI R, Giannarini G, Peruzzi V, Amparore D, et al
    MRI-informed prostate biopsy: What the radiologist should know on quality in biopsy planning and biopsy acquisition.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;164:110852.
    >> Share

  40. ROGERS HJ, Singh S, Barnes A, Obuchowski NA, et al
    Test-retest repeatability of ADC in prostate using the multi b-Value VERDICT acquisition.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;162:110782.
    >> Share

    April 2023
  41. BREMBILLA G, Lavalle S, Parry T, Cosenza M, et al
    Impact of prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) score on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at biopsy.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;164:110849.
    >> Share

    March 2023
  42. WOERNLE A, Dickinson L, Lelie S, Pendse D, et al
    A semi-automated software program to assess the impact of second reads in prostate MRI for equivocal lesions: results from a UK tertiary referral centre.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;162:110796.
    >> Share

  43. UEDA T, Ohno Y, Shinohara M, Yamamoto K, et al
    Reverse encoding distortion correction for diffusion-weighted MRI: Efficacy for improving image quality and ADC evaluation for differentiating malignant from benign areas in suspected prostatic cancer patients.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;162:110764.
    >> Share

  44. GHAFOOR S, Steinebrunner F, Stocker D, Hotker AM, et al
    Index lesion contouring on prostate MRI for targeted MRI/US fusion biopsy - Evaluation of mismatch between radiologists and urologists.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;162:110763.
    >> Share

    February 2023
  45. PRABHAKAR S, Schieda N
    Patient preparation for prostate MRI: A scoping review.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;162:110758.
    >> Share

  46. LIN Y, Yilmaz EC, Belue MJ, Turkbey B, et al
    Prostate MRI and image Quality: It is time to take stock.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;161:110757.
    >> Share

  47. FOROOKHI A, Laschena L, Pecoraro M, Borrelli A, et al
    Bridging the experience gap in prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging using artificial intelligence: A prospective multi-reader comparison study on inter-reader agreement in PI-RADS v2.1, image quality and reporting time between novice an
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;161:110749.
    >> Share

  48. HOTKER AM, Njoh S, Hofer LJ, Held U, et al
    Multi-reader evaluation of different image quality scoring systems in prostate MRI.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;161:110733.
    >> Share

    January 2023
  49. TOKUDA B, Yamada K, Takahata A, Fujihara A, et al
    Time-course changes in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging following focal cryotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Initial experience.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;160:110714.
    >> Share

  50. VILANOVA JC, Perez de Tudela A, Thio-Henestrosa S, Barcelo J, et al
    Usefulness of balanced SSFP sequence in robot-assisted MRI-guided prostate biopsy: Beyond scouting.
    Eur J Radiol. 2023;160:110707.
    >> Share

    November 2022
  51. KUROKAWA R, Kato S, Koyama H, Ishida M, et al
    Osteolytic or mixed bone metastasis is not uncommon in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
    Eur J Radiol. 2022;157:110595.
    >> Share

    September 2022
  52. ZIAYEE F, Schimmoller L, Blondin D, Boschheidgen M, et al
    Impact of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in 1.5 T versus 3 T MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection.
    Eur J Radiol. 2022;156:110520.
    >> Share

    August 2022
  53. ALFANO R, Bauman GS, Gomez JA, Gaed M, et al
    Prostate cancer classification using radiomics and machine learning on mp-MRI validated using co-registered histology.
    Eur J Radiol. 2022;156:110494.
    >> Share

    July 2022
  54. POTSCH N, Rainer E, Clauser P, Vatteroni G, et al
    Impact of PI-QUAL on PI-RADS and cancer yield in an MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy population.
    Eur J Radiol. 2022;154:110431.
    >> Share

  55. DORFINGER J, Ponholzer A, Stolzlechner M, Lenart S, et al
    MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy of the prostate compared to systematic prostate biopsy - Effectiveness and accuracy of a combined approach in daily clinical practice.
    Eur J Radiol. 2022;154:110432.
    >> Share

    March 2022
  56. CAGLIC I, Sushentsev N, Colarieti A, Warren AY, et al
    Value of the capsular enhancement sign on dynamic contrast-enhanced prostate multiparametric MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension.
    Eur J Radiol. 2022;150:110275.
    >> Share

  57. YANG L, Li M, Zhang MN, Yao J, et al
    Association of prostate zonal volume with location and aggressiveness of clinically significant prostate cancer: A multiparametric MRI study according to PI-RADS version 2.1.
    Eur J Radiol. 2022;150:110268.
    >> Share

  58. GIROMETTI R, Blandino A, Zichichi C, Cicero G, et al
    Inter-reader agreement of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score: A bicentric study.
    Eur J Radiol. 2022;150:110267.
    >> Share

    February 2022
  59. ASFUROGLU U, Asfuroglu BB, Ozer H, Gonul II, et al
    Which one is better for predicting extraprostatic extension on multiparametric MRI: ESUR score, Likert scale, tumor contact length, or EPE grade?
    Eur J Radiol. 2022;149:110228.
    >> Share

    January 2022
  60. ARNOLDNER MA, Polanec SH, Lazar M, Kadhjavi S, et al
    Rectal preparation significantly improves prostate imaging quality: Assessment of the PI-QUAL score with visual grading characteristics.
    Eur J Radiol. 2022;147:110145.
    >> Share

    December 2021
  61. VALENTIN B, Arsov C, Ullrich T, Demetrescu D, et al
    Comparison of 3 T mpMRI and pelvic CT examinations for detection of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;147:110110.
    >> Share

    November 2021
  62. HAGEN F, Norz V, Thaiss WM, Mair A, et al
    Diagnostic benefit of multiparametric MRI over contrast-enhanced CT in patients with bladder cancer: A single-center 1-year experience.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;146:110059.
    >> Share

  63. SKAWRAN SM, Sanchez V, Ghafoor S, Hotker AM, et al
    Primary staging in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: Multiparametric MRI and (68)Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI - What is the value of quantitative data from multiparametric MRI alone or in conjunction with clinical information?
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;146:110044.
    >> Share

    October 2021
  64. CHOI MH, Lee SW, Kim HG, Kim JY, et al
    3D MR fingerprinting (MRF) for simultaneous T1 and T2 quantification of the bone metastasis: Initial validation in prostate cancer patients.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;144:109990.
    >> Share

    September 2021
  65. SCHAUDINN A, Michaelis J, Franz T, Ho-Thi P, et al
    High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) hemiablation of the prostate: Late follow-up MRI findings in non-recurrent patients.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;144:109957.
    >> Share

  66. BOSCHHEIDGEN M, Ullrich T, Blondin D, Ziayee F, et al
    Comparison and prediction of artefact severity due to total hip replacement in 1.5 T versus 3 T MRI of the prostate.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;144:109949.
    >> Share

  67. FERDINANDUS J, Fendler WP, Morigi JJ, Fanti S, et al
    Theranostics in oncology: What radiologists want to know.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;142:109875.
    >> Share

    August 2021
  68. LI Z, Dan G, Tammana V, Johnson S, et al
    Predicting the aggressiveness of peripheral zone prostate cancer using a fractional order calculus diffusion model.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;143:109913.
    >> Share

  69. LI W, Dong A, Hong G, Shang W, et al
    Diagnostic performance of ESUR scoring system for extraprostatic prostate cancer extension: A meta-analysis.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;143:109896.
    >> Share

  70. MORADI F, Farolfi A, Fanti S, Iagaru A, et al
    Prostate cancer: Molecular imaging and MRI.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;143:109893.
    >> Share

  71. YOUN SY, Choi MH, Kim DH, Lee YJ, et al
    Detection and PI-RADS classification of focal lesions in prostate MRI: Performance comparison between a deep learning-based algorithm (DLA) and radiologists with various levels of experience.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;142:109894.
    >> Share

    June 2021
  72. GMEINER J, Garstka N, Helbich TH, Shariat SF, et al
    Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): Are the individual MRI sequences equivalent in diagnostic performance of high grade NMIBC and MIBC?
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;142:109829.
    >> Share

    May 2021
  73. ARSLAN A, Alis D, Tuna MB, Saglican Y, et al
    The visibility of prostate cancer concerning underlying histopathological variances: A single-center multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;141:109791.
    >> Share

  74. CAGLIC I, Sushentsev N, Shah N, Warren AY, et al
    Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy naive patients.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;141:109804.
    >> Share

  75. VURAL M, Coskun B, Kilic M, Durmaz S, et al
    In-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy in a patient group with PI-RADS 4 and 5 targets: A single center experience.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;141:109785.
    >> Share

    April 2021
  76. PONSIGLIONE A, Stanzione A, Imbriaco M
    Letter to the Editor regarding "Prostate cancer local staging using biparametric MRI: Assessment and comparison with multiparametric MRI".
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;139:109721.
    >> Share

    February 2021
  77. GASSENMAIER S, Afat S, Nickel D, Mostapha M, et al
    Deep learning-accelerated T2-weighted imaging of the prostate: Reduction of acquisition time and improvement of image quality.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;137:109600.
    >> Share

  78. REGIS L, Salazar A, Planas J, Celma A, et al
    The position of urethrovesical anastomosis after robotic radical prostatectomy assessed by MRI predicts early functional recovery: A cohort analyses from a randomized clinical trial.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;137:109589.
    >> Share

    January 2021
  79. TAKAHASHI H, Froemming AT, Bruining DH, Karnes RJ, et al
    Prostate MRI characteristics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
    Eur J Radiol. 2021;135:109503.
    >> Share


Free Medical Abstracts
Privacy Policy
Sponsors
Share

© Amedeo 1997-2016