March 2024
1. CAPEL CP, da Motta RJG, Pauwels R, Gaeta-Araujo H, et al
   Effect of metal artifact reduction level on the assessment of dental implant positioning by cone-beam computed tomography.
   Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024 Mar 11:twae008. doi: 10.1093.
   

   >> Share

   
   November 2023
2. MATTA RE, Knapp Giacaman S, Wiesmueller M, Lutz R, et al
   Quantitative analysis of zirconia and titanium implant artefacts in three-dimensional virtual models of multi-slice CT and cone beam CT: does scan protocol matter?
   Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023;52:20230275.
   

   >> Share

   
   
3. KUUSISTO N, Abushahba F, Syrjanen S, Huumonen S, et al
   Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
   Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023;52:20230252.
   

   >> Share

   
   July 2023
4. MANCINI L, Khehra A, Nguyen T, Barootchi S, et al
   Echo intensity and gray-level co-occurrence matrix analysis of soft tissue grafting biomaterials and dental implants: an in vitro ultrasonographic pilot study.
   Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Jul 4:20230033. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230033.
   

   >> Share

   
   January 2023
5. GU Y, Zhang D, Tao B, Wang F, et al
   A novel technique to quantify bone-to-implant contact of zygomatic implants: a radiographic analysis based on three-dimensional image registration and segmentation.
   Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023;52:20220210.
   

   >> Share

   
   September 2022
6. BOHNER L, Hanisch M, Sesma N, Blanck-Lubarsch M, et al
   Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental materials: a systematic review.
   Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022;51:20210450.
   

   >> Share

   
   July 2022
7. PRASAD AS, Sivakumar A
   ATM technique - a novel radiographic technique to assess the position of buccal shelf implants.
   Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022;51:20210346.
   

   >> Share

   
   February 2022
8. DEMIRTURK KOCASARAC H, Koenig LJ, Ustaoglu G, Oliveira ML, et al
   CBCT image artefacts generated by implants located inside the field of view or in the exomass.
   Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022;51:20210092.
   

   >> Share

   
   October 2020
9. CHAN HL, Kripfgans OD
   Ultrasonography for diagnosis of peri-implant diseases and conditions: a detailed scanning protocol and case demonstration.
   Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020;49:20190445.
   

   >> Share

   
   
10. MIN CK, Kim KA
    Quantitative analysis of metal artifacts of dental implant in CBCT image by correlation analysis to micro-CT: A microstructural study.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Oct 1:20200365. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200365.
    

    >> Share

    
    September 2020
11. DA SILVA RLB, Duailibi Neto EF, Todescan FF, Ruiz GM, et al
    Evaluation of cervical peri-implant optical density in longitudinal control of immediate implants in the anterior maxilla region.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020;49:20190396.
    

    >> Share

    
    June 2020
12. BOHNER L, Meier N, Gremse F, Tortamano P, et al
    Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts produced by dental implants with different geometries.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Jun 26:20200121. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200121.
    

    >> Share

    
    February 2020
13. KATO CN, Barra SG, Tavares NP, Amaral TM, et al
    Use of fractal analysis in dental images: a systematic review.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020;49:20180457.
    

    >> Share

    
    December 2019
14. KURSUN-CAKMAK ES, Demirturk Kocasarac H, Bayrak S, Ustaoglu G, et al
    Estimation of contrast-to-noise ratio in CT and CBCT images with varying scan settings in presence of different implant materials.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20190139.
    

    >> Share

    
    September 2019
15. COSTA ED, Peyneau PD, Ambrosano GMB, Oliveira ML, et al
    Influence of cone beam CT volume orientation on alveolar bone measurements in patients with different facial profiles.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20180330.
    

    >> Share

    
    

Free Medical Abstracts
Privacy Policy
Sponsors
Share