Amedeo Smart

Free Medical Literature Service



Ischemic Heart Disease

  Free Subscription

Articles published in
AJR Am J Roentgenol
    March 2024
  1. PARK C, Lee BC, Jeong WG, Park WJ, et al
    Coronary Artery Calcification on Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening CT in South Korea: Visual and Artificial Intelligence-Based Assessment and Association With Cardiovascular Events.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Mar 6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.30852.
    >> Share

    February 2024
  2. MONTEUUIS D, Bouzerar R, Dantoing C, Poujol J, et al
    Prospective Comparison of Free-Breathing Accelerated Cine Deep Learning Reconstruction Versus Standard Breath-Hold Cardiac MRI Sequences in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Feb 7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.30272.
    >> Share

  3. FONG FW, Hwang S, Xu Y, Hui WHA, et al
    Prognostic Utility of Left Atrial Strain From MRI Feature Tracking in Ischemic and Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Multicenter Study.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Feb 7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.30357.
    >> Share

    January 2024
  4. WOLF EV, Halfmann MC, Varga-Szemes A, Fink N, et al
    Photon-Counting Detector CT Virtual Monoenergetic Images for Coronary Artery Stenosis Quantification: Phantom and In Vivo Evaluation.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Jan 10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.30481.
    >> Share

    August 2023
  5. CZUM JM
    Beyond the AJR: Coronary Calcium Remains the Best Risk Predictor for Coronary Heart Disease for Now, But the Polygenic Risk Score Is Fast Becoming a Contender Among Young Adults.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Aug 30. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.30030.
    >> Share

    July 2023
    Editorial Comment: When Will Coronary Artery Stent Imaging Be Ready for Prime Time?
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Jul 5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29857.
    >> Share

    June 2023
  7. NAGAYAMA Y, Emoto T, Hayashi H, Kidoh M, et al
    Coronary Stent Evaluation by CTA: Image Quality Comparison Between Super-Resolution Deep-Learning Reconstruction and Other Reconstruction Algorithms.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Jun 28. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29506.
    >> Share

    May 2023
    Editorial Comment: On-Site Deep Learning-Based FFR-CT-A Novel Method to Evaluate Functionally Significant Stenosis.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 May 3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29561.
    >> Share

  9. GIANNOPOULOS AA, Keller L, Sepulcri D, Boehm R, et al
    High-Speed Onsite Deep-Learning Based FFR-CT Algorithm: Evaluation Using Invasive Angiography as Reference Standard.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 May 3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29156.
    >> Share

    January 2023
  10. ZIMMERMAN SL, Arbab-Zadeh A
    Beyond the AJR: Comparison of Coronary CTA and Invasive Coronary Angiography for Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain in Women and in Men.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Jan 18. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29000.
    >> Share

    August 2022
  11. MAGUDIA K, Bridge CP, Bay CP, Farah S, et al
    Utility of Normalized Body Composition Areas, Derived From Outpatient Abdominal CT Using a Fully Automated Deep Learning Method, for Predicting Subsequent Cardiovascular Events.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Aug 31. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27977.
    >> Share

  12. XU C, Yi Y, Xu M, Yan J, et al
    Coronary Artery Stent Evaluation by CTA: Impact of Deep Learning Reconstruction and Subtraction Technique.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Aug 10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27983.
    >> Share

    May 2022
    Editorial Comment: Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring-Contrast Material Is No Longer a Contraindication!
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 May 25. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27941.
    >> Share

    Editorial Comment: The Role of Artificial Intelligence-Guided Coronary CTA Interpretation in Coronary Artery Disease Management With Comparison to Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 May 4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27875.
    >> Share

    April 2022
  15. FRESNO CU, Tijmes FS, Thavendiranathan P, Akhtari S, et al
    Visual Ordinal Scoring of Coronary Artery Calcium on Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast Chest CT: A Retrospective Study of Diagnostic Performance and Prognostic Utility.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Apr 27. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27664.
    >> Share

  16. LIPKIN I, Telluri A, Kim Y, Sidahmed A, et al
    Coronary CTA With AI-QCT Interpretation: Comparison With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Obstructive Stenosis UsingInvasive Angiography as Reference Standard.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Apr 20. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.27289.
    >> Share

    March 2022
  17. TIAN D, Zhao SH, Wang Y, Lu HF, et al
    Unenhanced Whole-Heart Coronary MRA: Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of 1.5-T SSFP and 3-T Dixon Water-Fat Separation GRE Methods Using Coronary Angiography as Reference.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Mar 16. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.27292.
    >> Share

    December 2021
    Editorial Comment: New Photon-Counting Detector CT Technology May Improve Quantitative Evaluation of Epicardial Adipose Tissue, an Important Marker of Coronary Artery Inflammation.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Dec 22. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.27233.
    >> Share

  19. STOCKER TJ, Nuhlen N, Schmermund A, Leipsic J, et al
    Impact of Dose Reduction Strategies on Image Quality of Coronary CTA in Real-World Clinical Practice: A Subanalysis of PROTECTION VI Registry Data.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;217:1344-1352.
    >> Share

Free Medical Abstracts
Privacy Policy

© Amedeo 1997-2016