Amedeo Smart

Free Medical Literature Service

 

Amedeo

Breast Cancer
  Free Subscription

Articles published in
Eur Radiol
    March 2026
  1. WOO E, Lee JY, Seo BK
    Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Shear-wave dispersion imaging in breast cancer: methodological considerations and future perspectives.
    Eur Radiol. 2026 Mar 16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-026-12471.
    >> Share

  2. OZTURK M, Gurun E
    Letter to the Editor: Shear-wave dispersion imaging in breast cancer: methodological considerations and future perspectives.
    Eur Radiol. 2026 Mar 16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-026-12470.
    >> Share

  3. VAN DER WAAL D, Abbey CK, Tetteroo E, Geertse TD, et al
    Finding the optimal recall rate in breast cancer screening: results from the ROCS study.
    Eur Radiol. 2026 Mar 5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-026-12370.
    >> Share

  4. GEERTSE TD, Tetteroo E, Smid-Geirnaerdt MJA, Duijm LEM, et al
    Applying the "positive predictive value-recall diagram" to monitor performance and provide recommendations for screening radiologists.
    Eur Radiol. 2026;36:1919-1931.
    >> Share

  5. SCHIAFFINO S, Bernardi D, Healy N, Marino MA, et al
    ESR Essentials: artificial intelligence in breast imaging-practice recommendations by the European Society of Breast Imaging.
    Eur Radiol. 2026;36:1909-1918.
    >> Share

    February 2026
  6. EOM HJ, Kim HH, Kim SH, Gwon HY, et al
    Implant-displacement views alone for breast cancer screening in women with implants: a multicenter retrospective study.
    Eur Radiol. 2026 Feb 20. doi: 10.1007/s00330-026-12374.
    >> Share

  7. LEHNEN T, Polenske D, Wichtmann BD, Lehnen NC, et al
    AI software as a third reader in breast cancer screening-a prospective diagnostic observational study.
    Eur Radiol. 2026 Feb 5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-026-12359.
    >> Share

  8. LIU Y, Wu J, Zhang W, Wang T, et al
    Preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with intra-lymph node methylene blue injection for sentinel lymph node identification: a minimally invasive sentinel lymph node biopsy tracing approach.
    Eur Radiol. 2026;36:863-873.
    >> Share

  9. KIM HJ, Kim HH, Eom HJ, Choi WJ, et al
    Combined use of two artificial intelligence-based algorithms for mammography triaging: a retrospective simulation study.
    Eur Radiol. 2026;36:808-820.
    >> Share

  10. JANSE MHA, Janssen LM, Wolters-van der Ben EJM, Moman MR, et al
    Deep learning-based radiomics does not improve residual cancer burden prediction post-chemotherapy in LIMA breast MRI trial.
    Eur Radiol. 2026;36:850-862.
    >> Share

    January 2026
  11. LYTH J, Gialias P, Husberg M, Bernfort L, et al
    Results from a Swedish model-based analysis of the cost-effectiveness of AI-assisted digital mammography.
    Eur Radiol. 2026;36:754-764.
    >> Share

  12. ANDERMAN KJ, Daly AE, Newman AM, Dang PA, et al
    Placement of radiofrequency identification tags: Is there an optimal tag-to-target distance?
    Eur Radiol. 2026;36:64-72.
    >> Share

  13. SEXAUER R, Riehle F, Borkowski K, Ruppert C, et al
    Enhancing breast positioning quality through real-time AI feedback.
    Eur Radiol. 2026;36:55-63.
    >> Share

  14. LIU G, Yang N, Qu Y, Chen G, et al
    Developing ultrasound-based machine learning models for accurate differentiation between sclerosing adenosis and invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Eur Radiol. 2026;36:33-44.
    >> Share

    December 2025
  15. RODRIGUEZ DE TRUJILLO CAMPO-CO, Romero-Martin S, Rodriguez-Alonso B, Font-Ugalde P, et al
    Predictive factors of axillary pathological complete response in HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Dec 24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-12241.
    >> Share

  16. VAN AMSTEL FJG, van Mierlo RGM, Nelemans PJ, Engelen SME, et al
    Primary tumour response on breast MRI as a predictor of axillary pathologic response in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Dec 23. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-12249.
    >> Share

  17. AYDEMIR DG, Molwitz I, Beitzen-Heineke A, Chen H, et al
    Right ventricular and biatrial CMR strain analysis detects myocardial functional impairment after breast cancer therapy.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Dec 19. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-12257.
    >> Share

  18. SACCENTI L, El Bejjani L, Dao TH
    Postmastectomy radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: can imaging bring us closer to personalized care?
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Dec 17. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-12201.
    >> Share

  19. NOGUEIRA L, Adubeiro N, Nunes RG
    Changing slopes: can we be moving toward improved early treatment response prediction in breast cancer?
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Dec 5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-12204.
    >> Share

    November 2025
  20. GATEWOOD J, Peterson J, Aripoli A, Huppe A, et al
    Can a low b-value diffusion-weighted imaging sequence replace the standard T2-weighted fluid-sensitive sequence in breast MRI? A single-center prospective study.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:7235-7243.
    >> Share

    October 2025
  21. XU Z, Zhang Y, Zou Y, He Y, et al
    Identify high-risk patients of T1-2N1M0 breast cancer who benefit from postmastectomy radiotherapy: a dual-center retrospective propensity score-matched study.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Oct 25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-12091.
    >> Share

  22. SEKER ME, Ozkan O
    Navigating the future of mammography triaging: insights from combined usage of AI algorithms in breast cancer screening.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Oct 24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-12095.
    >> Share

  23. ZHANG T, Liang X, Mann RM
    Multimodal artificial intelligence in breast cancer: towards integrated prediction and personalized care.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Oct 22. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-12085.
    >> Share

  24. SARDANELLI F, Scaperrotta G
    Artificial intelligence for breast cancer prevention: the vision ahead.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Oct 8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-12036.
    >> Share

  25. LI Y, Wang J, Guo J, Yue C, et al
    Longitudinal wash-in slope changes on dynamic contrast enhancement MRI for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Oct 3. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-12042.
    >> Share

  26. COZZI A, Di Leo G, Houssami N, Gilbert FJ, et al
    Preoperative breast MRI for invasive ductal carcinoma with or without a DCIS component at needle biopsy: influence on surgical outcomes in the MIPA study.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:6433-6443.
    >> Share

  27. GOTO M, Le Bihan D, Sakai K, Yamada K, et al
    Reduction of biopsy rate in BI-RADS4 breast lesions: potential of an abbreviated advanced DWI protocol.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:6421-6432.
    >> Share

  28. ALLAJBEU I, Nanaa M, Manavaki R, Papalouka V, et al
    Improving the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography through lesion conspicuity and enhancement quantification.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:6385-6397.
    >> Share

    September 2025
  29. YANG P, Wang M, Mao J, Cai P, et al
    Impact of intraoperative radiotherapy vs postoperative radiotherapy on survival in early-stage breast cancer patients.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Sep 12. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11879.
    >> Share

  30. TENDERO R, Larroza A, Perez-Benito FJ, Perez-Cortes JC, et al
    Breast cancer risk assessment for screening: a hybrid artificial intelligence approach.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11980.
    >> Share

  31. HOVDA T, Larsen M, Bergan MB, Gjesvik J, et al
    Retrospective evaluation of a CE-marked AI system, including 1,017,208 mammography screening examinations.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:5685-5694.
    >> Share

  32. JU Y, Zhang G, Wan Y, Wang G, et al
    Integration of AI lesion classification, age, and BI-RADS assessment to reduce benign biopsies on breast ultrasound.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:5658-5670.
    >> Share

  33. AZCONA SAENZ J, Molero Calafell J, Roman Exposito M, Vall Foraster E, et al
    Preoperative estimation of the pathological breast tumor size in architectural distortions: a comparison of DM, DBT, US, CEM, and MRI.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:5635-5645.
    >> Share

    August 2025
  34. KIDOH M, Hirai T
    Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Current role of the pericoronary fat attenuation index in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11960.
    >> Share

  35. ROTZINGER DC, Fahrni G
    Letter to the Editor: Current role of the pericoronary fat attenuation index in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11959.
    >> Share

  36. GIANNOTTI E, Pasculli M, Sella T, Van Ongeval C, et al
    ESR Essentials: post-treatment breast cancer surveillance from mammography to a more personalised approach-practice recommendations by the European Society of Breast Imaging.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11819.
    >> Share

  37. BOLAN PJ, Rahbar H, Partridge SC
    Can we cut the contrast? DWI shows similar value to standard MRI for assessing treatment response in breast cancer.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11912.
    >> Share

  38. SUBELACK J, Morant R, Blum M, Grawingholt A, et al
    Retrospective evaluation of interval breast cancer screening mammograms by radiologists and AI.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11833.
    >> Share

  39. WAGNER T, Cockmartin L, Wang YK, Marshall N, et al
    A practical work around for breast density distribution discrepancies between mammographic images from different vendors.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:4885-4892.
    >> Share

  40. LU F, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Feng N, et al
    Diagnostic accuracy of node-RADS for the detection of lymph node invasion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:4429-4437.
    >> Share

    July 2025
  41. COZZI A, Di Leo G, Houssami N, Gilbert FJ, et al
    Preoperative breast MRI reduces reoperations for unilateral invasive lobular carcinoma: a patient-matched analysis from the MIPA study.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:3990-4000.
    >> Share

  42. VAN DER VEER EL, Rozemond F, Generaal MI, Bluekens AMJ, et al
    Interhospital variations in diagnostic work-up following recall at biennial screening mammography-a population-based study.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:3964-3978.
    >> Share

  43. JOHNSON K, Ikeda DM, Andersson I, Zackrisson S, et al
    Cancers not detected in one-view breast tomosynthesis screening-characteristics and reasons for non-detection.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:3951-3960.
    >> Share

  44. HUANG J, He N, Li J, Chen J, et al
    Performance of contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT to predict nipple-areolar complex involvement in early-stage breast cancer.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11787.
    >> Share

    June 2025
  45. TAIB AG, Partridge GJW, Yao L, Darker I, et al
    The evaluation of artificial intelligence in mammography-based breast cancer screening: Is breast-level analysis enough?
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11733.
    >> Share

  46. EOM HJ, Kim HH, Kim HJ, Choi WJ, et al
    Comparison of diffusion-weighted and contrast-enhanced MRI for monitoring response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11640.
    >> Share

  47. VAN WINKEL SL, Samperna R, Loehrer EA, Drukker CA, et al
    Breast cancer in women after withdrawing from an increased-risk MRI screening program.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11718.
    >> Share

  48. SANTONOCITO A, Zarcaro C, Zeitouni L, Ferrara F, et al
    A head-to-head comparison of breast lesion's conspicuity at contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:3070-3079.
    >> Share

    May 2025
  49. VERBOOM SD, Mainprize JG, Peters J, Broeders M, et al
    More than density: validating a mammographic masking prediction model in Dutch breast cancer screening.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11687.
    >> Share

  50. THOMASSIN-NAGGARA I, Athanasiou A, Kilburn-Toppin F, Forrai G, et al
    Misdiagnosis in breast imaging: a statement paper from European Society Breast Imaging (EUSOBI)-Part 2: Main causes of errors in breast imaging and recommendations from European Society of Breast Imaging to limit misdiagnosis.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:2397-2411.
    >> Share

  51. ZARCARO C, Santonocito A, Zeitouni L, Ferrara F, et al
    Inter-reader agreement of the BI-RADS CEM lexicon.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:2378-2386.
    >> Share

  52. NISSAN N, Gluskin J, Ochoa-Albiztegui RE, Fruchtman-Brot H, et al
    Performance of breast MRI for high-risk screening during lactation.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:2366-2375.
    >> Share

  53. LIEBERT A, Schreiter H, Kapsner LA, Eberle J, et al
    Impact of non-contrast-enhanced imaging input sequences on the generation of virtual contrast-enhanced breast MRI scans using neural network.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:2603-2616.
    >> Share

    April 2025
  54. ROMEO V, Rocco N
    A beneficial impact of pre-operative MRI in the surgical management of HER2-positive breast cancer.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11626.
    >> Share

  55. HUA B, Chen J, Wang Y, Hu P, et al
    Multivariable model to predict breast cancer in non-mass enhancement lesions: a study on contrast-enhanced mammography.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11597.
    >> Share

  56. MA Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Bian K, et al
    Comparison of contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT, MRI, and mammography for breast cancer characterization.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11568.
    >> Share

  57. XIA S, Hua Q, Song Y, Yuan C, et al
    Super-resolution ultrasound imaging of intranodal lymphatic sinuses for predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a preliminary study.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr 5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11520.
    >> Share

  58. HONDA M, Sigmund EE, Le Bihan D, Pinker K, et al
    Advanced breast diffusion-weighted imaging: what are the next steps? A proposal from the EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-weighted Imaging working group.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:2130-2140.
    >> Share

  59. ALCANTARA R, Azcona J, Pitarch M, Arenas N, et al
    Breast radiation dose with contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: a retrospective comparison with stereotactic and tomosynthesis guidance.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:2119-2129.
    >> Share

    March 2025
  60. KIM H, Choi JS, Chi SA, Ryu JM, et al
    Digital mammography with AI-based computer-aided diagnosis to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer patients: comparison with MRI.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11390.
    >> Share

  61. EOM HJ, Choi WJ, Sun YJ, Kim HJ, et al
    Preoperative breast MRI in HER2-positive/hormone receptor-negative breast cancer: surgical outcomes using propensity score matching.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11494.
    >> Share

  62. VALKOVIC ZUJIC P
    Challenges and variability in breast cancer screening: diagnostic work-up and strategies for standardization across Europe.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11425.
    >> Share

  63. BEZEK CD, Farkas M, Schweizer D, Kubik-Huch RA, et al
    Breast density assessment via quantitative sound-speed measurement using conventional ultrasound transducers.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:1490-1501.
    >> Share

  64. VATTERONI G, Dietzel M, Baltzer PAT
    Can structured integration of BI-RADS criteria by a clinical decision rule reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in BI-RADS 4 lesions? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:1504-1513.
    >> Share

    February 2025
  65. LOUIS FM, Sonke GS, Mann RM
    Image-guided adaption of systemic therapy in breast cancer patients.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Feb 13. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11456.
    >> Share

  66. MALHAIRE C, Umay O, Cockenpot V, Selhane F, et al
    Predicting axillary residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer using baseline MRI and ultrasound.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Feb 8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11408.
    >> Share

  67. ABDULLAH KA, Marziali S, Nanaa M, Escudero Sanchez L, et al
    Deep learning-based breast cancer diagnosis in breast MRI: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11406.
    >> Share

  68. RANGARAJAN K, Manivannan VV, Singh H, Gupta A, et al
    Simulation training in mammography with AI-generated images: a multireader study.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:562-571.
    >> Share

  69. LE BIHAN D, Iima M, Partridge SC
    Fat-signal suppression in breast diffusion-weighted imaging: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:733-741.
    >> Share

  70. OKOLIE A, Dirrichs T, Huck LC, Nebelung S, et al
    Accelerating breast MRI acquisition with generative AI models.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:1092-1100.
    >> Share

  71. ATHANASIOU A, Appelman L, Pijnappel RM, Gilbert FJ, et al
    ESR Essentials: diagnostic work-up in patients with symptomatic breast disease-practice recommendations by the European Society of Breast Imaging.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:723-732.
    >> Share

  72. NISSAN N, Gluskin J, Ochoa-Albiztegui RE, Sung JS, et al
    Asymmetric background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: associated factors, diagnostic workup, and clinical outcome.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:712-722.
    >> Share

    January 2025
  73. D'ANGELO A, Caprini F, Adele Marino M
    Current status of breast cancer screening in transgender and gender-diverse populations.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11355.
    >> Share

  74. NANAA M, Manavaki R, van Nijnatten TJA, Stranz N, et al
    Tumour growth rate and invasive interval cancer characteristics in a UK breast cancer screening population.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan 21. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11342.
    >> Share

  75. KIDOH M, Oda S, Sueta D, Egashira K, et al
    Serial assessment of coronary artery inflammation using cardiac CT in anthracycline chemotherapy for breast cancer.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan 21. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11347.
    >> Share

  76. KREGTING L, van den Oever D, Pennings L, Pijnappel R, et al
    The Screening Tomosynthesis Trial with Advanced Reader Methods (STREAM): design and rationale of a population-based breast cancer screening trial.
    Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan 9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11324.
    >> Share

  77. PAYNE NR, Hickman SE, Black R, Priest AN, et al
    Breast density effect on the sensitivity of digital screening mammography in a UK cohort.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:177-187.
    >> Share

  78. KIM H, Chi SA, Kim K, Han BK, et al
    Ultrafast sequence-based prediction model and nomogram to differentiate additional suspicious lesions on preoperative breast MRI.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:188-201.
    >> Share

  79. SOMMER A, Weigel S, Hense HW, Gerss J, et al
    Radiation exposure and screening yield by digital breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography: results of the TOSYMA Trial breast density related.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:166-176.
    >> Share

  80. ZHOU J, Liu H, Miao H, Ye S, et al
    Breast lesions on MRI in mass and non-mass enhancement: Kaiser score and modified Kaiser score + for readers of variable experience.
    Eur Radiol. 2025;35:140-150.
    >> Share

    December 2024
  81. NETTI S, D'Ecclesiis O, Corso F, Botta F, et al
    Methodological issues in radiomics: impact on accuracy of MRI for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Dec 19. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11260.
    >> Share

    November 2024
  82. HOFF SR
    Challenges when comparing tomosynthesis and 2D mammography in breast cancer screening.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Nov 21. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11180.
    >> Share

  83. MANN RM, Rubio IT, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Fuchsjager M, et al
    ESR Bridges: image-guided breast cancer treatment de-escalation-a multidisciplinary view.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Nov 20. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11208.
    >> Share

  84. THOMASSIN-NAGGARA I, Kilburn-Toppin F, Athanasiou A, Forrai G, et al
    Misdiagnosis in breast imaging: a statement paper from European Society Breast Imaging (EUSOBI)-Part 1: The role of common errors in radiology in missed breast cancer and implications of misdiagnosis.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Nov 15. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11128.
    >> Share

    October 2024
  85. KELLER AH, Fowler AM
    Balancing early detection with lactation-related challenges: breast MRI for high-risk breast cancer screening.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct 31. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11129.
    >> Share

  86. GIANNOTTI E, Lambertini M
    Further insights into the use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer follow-up: the pros view.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct 16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11096.
    >> Share

  87. WALLIS MG
    Further insights into the use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer follow-up: the cons view.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct 15. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11097.
    >> Share

  88. LIBESMAN S, Li T, Marinovich ML, Seidler AL, et al
    Interval breast cancer rates for tomosynthesis vs mammography population screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct 3. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11085.
    >> Share

  89. HONDA M, Kataoka M
    Quantitative evaluation of breast lesions using ultrafast MRI has come so far.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:6283-6284.
    >> Share

  90. BERG WA
    Why don't all women with extremely dense breasts want MRI screening?
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:6332-6333.
    >> Share

  91. BITENCOURT AGV
    The impact of AI implementation in mammographic screening: redefining dense breast screening practices.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:6296-6297.
    >> Share

  92. VEENHUIZEN SGA, van Grinsven SEL, Laseur IL, Bakker MF, et al
    Re-attendance in supplemental breast MRI screening rounds of the DENSE trial for women with extremely dense breasts.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:6334-6347.
    >> Share

  93. KIM HJ, Kim HH, Kim KH, Lee JS, et al
    Use of a commercial artificial intelligence-based mammography analysis software for improving breast ultrasound interpretations.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:6320-6331.
    >> Share

  94. VANCOILLIE L, Cockmartin L, Lueck F, Marshall N, et al
    Optimized signal of calcifications in wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis: a virtual imaging trial.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:6309-6319.
    >> Share

  95. BERGAN MB, Larsen M, Moshina N, Bartsch H, et al
    AI performance by mammographic density in a retrospective cohort study of 99,489 participants in BreastScreen Norway.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:6298-6308.
    >> Share

  96. AMITAI Y, Freitas VAR, Golan O, Kessner R, et al
    The diagnostic performance of ultrafast MRI to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:6285-6295.
    >> Share

  97. GOULAM-HOUSSEIN S, Ye XY, Fleming R, Au F, et al
    Evaluating persistent T1-weighted lesions without concurrent abnormal enhancement on breast MRI in neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients: implications for complete pathological response.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:6273-6282.
    >> Share

    September 2024
  98. OZCAN BB, Wanniarachchi H, Mason RP, Dogan BE, et al
    Current status of optoacoustic breast imaging and future trends in clinical application: is it ready for prime time?
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:6092-6107.
    >> Share

    August 2024
  99. VAN DER VOORT A, van der Hoogt KJJ, Wessels R, Schipper RJ, et al
    Correction: Diffusion-weighted imaging in addition to contrast-enhanced MRI in identifying complete response in HER2-positive breast cancer.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11008.
    >> Share

  100. KLEIN WOLTERINK F, Ab Mumin N, Appelman L, Derks-Rekers M, et al
    Diagnostic performance of 3D automated breast ultrasound (3D-ABUS) in a clinical screening setting-a retrospective study.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:5451-5460.
    >> Share

  101. SCHIAFFINO S, Cozzi A, Clauser P, Giannotti E, et al
    Current use and future perspectives of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM): a survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:5439-5450.
    >> Share

  102. PULIDO-CARMONA C, Romero-Martin S, Raya-Povedano JL, Cara-Garcia M, et al
    Interval cancer in the Cordoba Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (CBTST): comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis plus digital mammography to digital mammography alone.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:5427-5438.
    >> Share

    July 2024
  103. FALLENBERG EM
    Implementing the advantages of contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced breast MRI in breast cancer staging.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10896.
    >> Share

  104. SARTOR H, Sturesdotter L, Larsson AM, Rosendahl AH, et al
    Mammographic features differ with body composition in women with breast cancer.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10937.
    >> Share

  105. VAN DER VOORT A, van der Hoogt KJJ, Wessels R, Schipper RJ, et al
    Diffusion-weighted imaging in addition to contrast-enhanced MRI in identifying complete response in HER2-positive breast cancer.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Jul 5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10857.
    >> Share

  106. DUIJM LEM
    Dense breasts at breast cancer screening: can DWI-based breast MRI without contrast help us in the pursuit of personalized screening?
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:4727-4729.
    >> Share

  107. WANG X, Jing L, Yan L, Wang P, et al
    A conditional inference tree model for predicting cancer risk of non-mass lesions detected on breast ultrasound.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:4776-4788.
    >> Share

  108. NISSAN N
    Pre-injection anticipation of artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI: artificial intelligence harnessed for the aid once again.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:4750-4751.
    >> Share

  109. CHEN C, Turco S, Kapetas P, Mann R, et al
    Spatiotemporal analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:4764-4773.
    >> Share

  110. LIEBERT A, Das BK, Kapsner LA, Eberle J, et al
    Smart forecasting of artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI before contrast agent administration.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:4752-4763.
    >> Share

  111. GENNARO G, Povolo L, Del Genio S, Ciampani L, et al
    Using automated software evaluation to improve the performance of breast radiographers in tomosynthesis screening.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:4738-4749.
    >> Share

  112. WIELEMA M, Sijens PE, Pijnappel RM, De Bock GH, et al
    Image quality of DWI at breast MRI depends on the amount of fibroglandular tissue: implications for unenhanced screening.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:4730-4737.
    >> Share

    June 2024
  113. MORAN CJ
    Ready the treasure at our feet, MRI feature analysis in young women with breast cancer.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10840.
    >> Share

  114. PEDICONI F, Maroncelli R, Pasculli M, Galati F, et al
    Performance of MRI for standardized lymph nodes assessment in breast cancer: are we ready for Node-RADS?
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10828.
    >> Share

  115. EL KHOURY M, Mesurolle B
    Pre-operative MRI in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: the ongoing debate.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:3967-3969.
    >> Share

  116. COZZI A, Di Leo G, Houssami N, Gilbert FJ, et al
    Preoperative breast MRI positively impacts surgical outcomes of needle biopsy-diagnosed pure DCIS: a patient-matched analysis from the MIPA study.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:3970-3980.
    >> Share

  117. WAUGH J, Evans J, Miocevic M, Lockie D, et al
    Performance of artificial intelligence in 7533 consecutive prevalent screening mammograms from the BreastScreen Australia program.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:3947-3957.
    >> Share

  118. KUHL J, Elhakim MT, Stougaard SW, Rasmussen BSB, et al
    Population-wide evaluation of artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment of screening mammograms.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:3935-3946.
    >> Share

  119. SKAANE P, Osteras BH, Yanakiev S, Lie T, et al
    Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:3912-3923.
    >> Share

  120. KIM HJ, Choi WJ, Gwon HY, Jang SJ, et al
    Improving mammography interpretation for both novice and experienced readers: a comparative study of two commercial artificial intelligence software.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:3924-3934.
    >> Share

    May 2024
  121. CHAE EY, Jung MR, Cha JH, Shin HJ, et al
    A predictive model using MRI and clinicopathologic features for breast cancer recurrence in young women treated with upfront surgery.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10805.
    >> Share

  122. ALVAREZ-BENITO M
    Imaging evaluation of neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment: where do we stand?
    Eur Radiol. 2024 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10799.
    >> Share

  123. FU Y, Lei YT, Huang YH, Mei F, et al
    Longitudinal ultrasound-based AI model predicts axillary lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a multicenter study.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10786.
    >> Share

  124. ZUIANI C, Mansutti I, Caronia G, Linda A, et al
    Added value of the EUSOBI diffusion levels in breast MRI.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:3352-3363.
    >> Share

  125. WANG L, Wang P, Shao H, Li J, et al
    Role of contrast-enhanced mammography in the preoperative detection of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: a comparison with low-energy image and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:3342-3351.
    >> Share

    April 2024
  126. YAN R, Murakami W, Mortazavi S, Yu T, et al
    Quantitative assessment of background parenchymal enhancement is associated with lifetime breast cancer risk in screening MRI.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10758.
    >> Share

  127. MARCON M, Fuchsjager MH, Clauser P, Mann RM, et al
    ESR Essentials: screening for breast cancer - general recommendations by EUSOBI.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr 24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10740.
    >> Share

  128. VEDANTHAM S
    Contrast-enhanced breast computed tomography: can lymph node metastasis be predicted from primary tumor?
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:2574-2575.
    >> Share

  129. XU Z, Lin Y, Huo J, Gao Y, et al
    A bimodal nomogram as an adjunct tool to reduce unnecessary breast biopsy following discordant ultrasonic and mammographic BI-RADS assessment.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:2608-2618.
    >> Share

  130. MAO C, Hu L, Jiang W, Qiu Y, et al
    Discrimination between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing and HER2-overexpressing breast cancers: a comparative study of four MRI diffusion models.
    Eur Radiol. 2024;34:2546-2559.
    >> Share

    March 2024
  131. CAMPS-HERRERO J, Pijnappel R, Balleyguier C
    MR-contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) for follow-up of breast cancer patients: a "pros and cons" debate.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Mar 15. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10684.
    >> Share

    February 2024
  132. KOCH HW, Larsen M, Bartsch H, Martiniussen MA, et al
    How do AI markings on screening mammograms correspond to cancer location? An informed review of 270 breast cancer cases in BreastScreen Norway.
    Eur Radiol. 2024 Feb 23. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10662.
    >> Share


Free Medical Abstracts
Privacy Policy
Sponsors
Share

© Amedeo 1997-2016