Amedeo Smart

Free Medical Literature Service


 

Amedeo

Breast Cancer

  Free Subscription

Articles published in
AJR Am J Roentgenol
    September 2017
  1. GEORGIAN-SMITH D
    Screening Mammography: Effect of Recall Rates by Population Type and Acknowledgement of Founding Father Myron Moskowitz.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W197.
    >> Share

    August 2017
  2. HA SM, Chae EY, Cha JH, Kim HH, et al
    Association of BRCA Mutation Types, Imaging Features, and Pathologic Findings in Patients With Breast Cancer With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug 10:1-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16957.
    >> Share

  3. HOOLEY RJ, Philpotts LE
    Reply to "Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Assists in Differentiating Vascular Calcification From Malignant Calcification".
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W116.
    >> Share

  4. COHEN Y
    Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Assists in Differentiating Vascular Calcification From Malignant Calcification.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W115.
    >> Share

  5. GRABLER P, Ansell DA
    Reply to "Finding the Best Recall and Cancer Detection Rates for Screening Mammography".
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W111.
    >> Share

  6. SEIDENWURM D, Breslau J
    Finding the Best Recall and Cancer Detection Rates for Screening Mammography.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W110.
    >> Share

    July 2017
  7. ALSHAFEIY TI, Wadih A, Nicholson BT, Rochman CM, et al
    Comparison Between Digital and Synthetic 2D Mammograms in Breast Density Interpretation.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W36-W41.
    >> Share

    June 2017
  8. MYERS KS, Green LA, Lebron L, Morris EA, et al
    Imaging Appearance and Clinical Impact of Preoperative Breast MRI in Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jun 13:W1-W7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17124.
    >> Share

  9. STRIGEL RM, Burnside ES, Elezaby M, Fowler AM, et al
    Utility of BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions for Screening Breast MRI.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:1392-1399.
    >> Share

    May 2017
  10. BERGER N, Luparia A, Di Leo G, Carbonaro LA, et al
    Diagnostic Performance of MRI Versus Galactography in Women With Pathologic Nipple Discharge: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May 24:1-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16682.
    >> Share

  11. TALIAFERRO AS, Fein-Zachary V, Venkataraman S, Mehta TS, et al
    Imaging Features of Spindle Cell Breast Lesions.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May 24:1-11. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17610.
    >> Share

  12. PITMAN JA, McGinty GB, Soman RR, Drotman MB, et al
    Screening Mammography for Women in Their 40s: The Potential Impact of the American Cancer Society and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May 15:1-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17759.
    >> Share

    March 2017
  13. EOM HJ, Cha JH, Choi WJ, Chae EY, et al
    Predictive Clinicopathologic and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Findings for Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar 28:1-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17125.
    >> Share

    February 2017
  14. AMORNSIRIPANITCH N, Mangano M, Niell BL
    Screening Mammography: Patient Perceptions and Preferences Regarding Communication of Estimated Breast Cancer Risk.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb 22:1-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16779.
    >> Share

  15. AMINOLOLAMA-SHAKERI S, Flowers CI, McLaren CE, Wisner DJ, et al
    Can Radiologists Predict the Presence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer?
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb 15:1-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16073.
    >> Share

  16. JAVITT MC
    Section Editor's Notebook: The Future of Breast Imaging-Find It and Fix It.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:245-247.
    >> Share

  17. HOOLEY RJ, Durand MA, Philpotts LE
    Advances in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:256-266.
    >> Share

    January 2017
  18. PLAZA MJ, Handa P, Esserman LE
    Preoperative MRI Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: Comparison of Luminal A Versus Luminal B Subtypes in a Paradigm Using Ki-67 and Receptor Status.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan 31:1-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15788.
    >> Share

  19. HUANG ML, Speer M, Dogan BE, Rauch GM, et al
    Imaging-Concordant Benign MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy May Not Warrant MRI Follow-Up.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan 31:1-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16576.
    >> Share

  20. LAM DL, Houssami N, Lee JM
    Imaging Surveillance After Primary Breast Cancer Treatment.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan 11:1-11. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16300.
    >> Share

  21. FERRE R, Omeroglu A, Mesurolle B
    Sonographic Appearance of Lesions Diagnosed as Lobular Neoplasia at Sonographically Guided Biopsies.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan 11:1-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15056.
    >> Share

    December 2016
  22. LEE J, Tanaka E, Eby PR, Zhou S, et al
    Preoperative Breast MRI: Surgeons' Patient Selection Patterns and Potential Bias in Outcomes Analyses.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Dec 27:1-10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17038.
    >> Share

  23. PARK VY, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Yoon JH, et al
    Perfusion Parameters on Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Are Associated With Disease-Specific Survival in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Dec 22:1-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16476.
    >> Share

  24. KRISHNAMURTHY S, Bevers T, Kuerer HM, Smith B, et al
    Paradigm Shifts in Breast Care Delivery: Impact of Imaging in a Multidisciplinary Environment.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

    November 2016
  25. DESTOUNIS S, Johnston L, Highnam R, Arieno A, et al
    Using Volumetric Breast Density to Quantify the Potential Masking Risk of Mammographic Density.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

  26. RAUCH GM, Adrada BE, Kuerer HM, van la Parra RF, et al
    Multimodality Imaging for Evaluating Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

  27. CHHOR CM, Mercado CL
    Abbreviated MRI Protocols: Wave of the Future for Breast Cancer Screening.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

  28. PRABHU V, Chhor CM, Ego-Osuala IO, Xiao JM, et al
    Frequency and Outcomes of Incidental Breast Lesions Detected on Abdominal MRI Over a 7-Year Period.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

    October 2016
  29. LEWIN AA, Heller SL, Jaglan S, Elias K, et al
    Radiologic-Pathologic Discordance and Outcome After MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

  30. FLEMING MM, Holbrook AI, Newell MS
    Update on Image-Guided Percutaneous Ablation of Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

  31. HRUSKA CB
    Molecular Breast Imaging for Screening in Dense Breasts: State of the Art and Future Directions.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

  32. SHIN K, Caudle AS, Kuerer HM, Santiago L, et al
    Radiologic Mapping for Targeted Axillary Dissection: Needle Biopsy to Excision.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

    September 2016
  33. GRABLER P, Sighoko D, Wang L, Allgood K, et al
    Recall and Cancer Detection Rates for Screening Mammography: Finding the Sweet Spot.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

    August 2016
  34. KU YJ, Kim HH, Cha JH, Shin HJ, et al
    Correlation Between MRI and the Level of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

    May 2016
  35. SHERMIS RB, Wilson KD, Doyle MT, Martin TS, et al
    Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening With Molecular Breast Imaging for Women With Dense Breast Tissue.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

  36. YOUK JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, Kim JA, et al
    Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:1056-62.
    >> Share

    March 2016
  37. DRYDEN MJ, Dogan BE, Fox P, Wang C, et al
    Imaging Factors That Influence Surgical Margins After Preoperative I Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions: Comparison With Wire Localization.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

  38. EKPO EU, Ujong UP, Mello-Thoms C, McEntee MF, et al
    Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    >> Share

  39. CHAE EY, Cha JH, Shin HJ, Choi WJ, et al
    Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:666-72.
    >> Share

  40. ALSHARIF S, Ferre R, Omeroglu A, Khoury ME, et al
    Imaging Features Associated With Posttraumatic Breast Neuromas.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:660-5.
    >> Share

    February 2016
  41. GUPTA D, Karst I, Mendelson EB
    Value-Based Reimbursement: Impact of Curtailing Physician Autonomy in Medical Decision Making.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:276-9.
    >> Share

  42. FERRE R, Aldis A, AlSharif S, Omeroglu A, et al
    Differentiation of Fibroadenomas and Pure Mucinous Carcinomas on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast Using Volume Segmentation for Kinetic Analysis: A Feasibility Study.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:253-8.
    >> Share

  43. BITENCOURT AG, Graziano L, Osorio CA, Guatelli CS, et al
    MRI Features of Mucinous Cancer of the Breast: Correlation With Pathologic Findings and Other Imaging Methods.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:238-46.
    >> Share


Free Medical Abstracts
Privacy Policy
Sponsors
Share

© Amedeo 1997-2016