March 2024
1. PARK C, Lee BC, Jeong WG, Park WJ, et al
   Coronary Artery Calcification on Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening CT in South Korea: Visual and Artificial Intelligence-Based Assessment and Association With Cardiovascular Events.
   AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Mar 6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.30852.
   

   >> Share

   
   February 2024
2. MONTEUUIS D, Bouzerar R, Dantoing C, Poujol J, et al
   Prospective Comparison of Free-Breathing Accelerated Cine Deep Learning Reconstruction Versus Standard Breath-Hold Cardiac MRI Sequences in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease.
   AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Feb 7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.30272.
   

   >> Share

   
   January 2024
3. WOLF EV, Halfmann MC, Varga-Szemes A, Fink N, et al
   Photon-Counting Detector CT Virtual Monoenergetic Images for Coronary Artery Stenosis Quantification: Phantom and In Vivo Evaluation.
   AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Jan 10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.30481.
   

   >> Share

   
   August 2023
4. CZUM JM
   Beyond the AJR: Coronary Calcium Remains the Best Risk Predictor for Coronary Heart Disease for Now, But the Polygenic Risk Score Is Fast Becoming a Contender Among Young Adults.
   AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Aug 30. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.30030.
   

   >> Share

   
   July 2023
5. BOWMAN AW
   Editorial Comment: When Will Coronary Artery Stent Imaging Be Ready for Prime Time?
   AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Jul 5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29857.
   

   >> Share

   
   June 2023
6. NAGAYAMA Y, Emoto T, Hayashi H, Kidoh M, et al
   Coronary Stent Evaluation by CTA: Image Quality Comparison Between Super-Resolution Deep-Learning Reconstruction and Other Reconstruction Algorithms.
   AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Jun 28. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29506.
   

   >> Share

   
   May 2023
7. TOMIZAWA N
   Editorial Comment: On-Site Deep Learning-Based FFR-CT-A Novel Method to Evaluate Functionally Significant Stenosis.
   AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 May 3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29561.
   

   >> Share

   
   
8. GIANNOPOULOS AA, Keller L, Sepulcri D, Boehm R, et al
   High-Speed Onsite Deep-Learning Based FFR-CT Algorithm: Evaluation Using Invasive Angiography as Reference Standard.
   AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 May 3. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29156.
   

   >> Share

   
   January 2023
9. ZIMMERMAN SL, Arbab-Zadeh A
   Beyond the AJR: Comparison of Coronary CTA and Invasive Coronary Angiography for Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain in Women and in Men.
   AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Jan 18. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29000.
   

   >> Share

   
   August 2022
10. MAGUDIA K, Bridge CP, Bay CP, Farah S, et al
    Utility of Normalized Body Composition Areas, Derived From Outpatient Abdominal CT Using a Fully Automated Deep Learning Method, for Predicting Subsequent Cardiovascular Events.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Aug 31. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27977.
    

    >> Share

    
    
11. XU C, Yi Y, Xu M, Yan J, et al
    Coronary Artery Stent Evaluation by CTA: Impact of Deep Learning Reconstruction and Subtraction Technique.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Aug 10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27983.
    

    >> Share

    
    May 2022
12. LEVSKY JM
    Editorial Comment: Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring-Contrast Material Is No Longer a Contraindication!
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 May 25. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27941.
    

    >> Share

    
    
13. AGHAYEV A
    Editorial Comment: The Role of Artificial Intelligence-Guided Coronary CTA Interpretation in Coronary Artery Disease Management With Comparison to Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 May 4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27875.
    

    >> Share

    
    April 2022
14. FRESNO CU, Tijmes FS, Thavendiranathan P, Akhtari S, et al
    Visual Ordinal Scoring of Coronary Artery Calcium on Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast Chest CT: A Retrospective Study of Diagnostic Performance and Prognostic Utility.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Apr 27. doi: 10.2214/AJR.22.27664.
    

    >> Share

    
    
15. LIPKIN I, Telluri A, Kim Y, Sidahmed A, et al
    Coronary CTA With AI-QCT Interpretation: Comparison With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Obstructive Stenosis UsingInvasive Angiography as Reference Standard.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Apr 20. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.27289.
    

    >> Share

    
    March 2022
16. TIAN D, Zhao SH, Wang Y, Lu HF, et al
    Unenhanced Whole-Heart Coronary MRA: Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of 1.5-T SSFP and 3-T Dixon Water-Fat Separation GRE Methods Using Coronary Angiography as Reference.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Mar 16. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.27292.
    

    >> Share

    
    December 2021
17. MURPHY DJ
    Editorial Comment: New Photon-Counting Detector CT Technology May Improve Quantitative Evaluation of Epicardial Adipose Tissue, an Important Marker of Coronary Artery Inflammation.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Dec 22. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.27233.
    

    >> Share

    
    
18. STOCKER TJ, Nuhlen N, Schmermund A, Leipsic J, et al
    Impact of Dose Reduction Strategies on Image Quality of Coronary CTA in Real-World Clinical Practice: A Subanalysis of PROTECTION VI Registry Data.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;217:1344-1352.
    

    >> Share

    
    

Free Medical Abstracts
Privacy Policy
Sponsors
Share